“When
mind reasons and gut guides, your decision becomes visionary!”
An old quote by an Indian philosopher
resonates quite well with the topic. It unfolds a carefully protected secret of
making visionary decisions by leaders with the help of these poetic lines. It
emphasizes on how the interaction between the mind and the gut becomes
important for making a sustainable-futuristic decision. This essay intends to
discuss about how such interactions occur and how to find out the right
proportion of such interaction.
Firstly,
let us start by understanding about what a visionary decision mean and why it
is important. One can define vision simply as an imagination of how one wants their
future to look like. When one decides to paint that imagination into reality,
that decision becomes visionary. Such vision gives us a purpose to live, a target
to achieve.
It
can be an individual career choice where one wants to see oneself as
‘so-and-so’ in future. Or choice to contribute to a common cause to paint a
shared future. Take the instance of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. From his career choice
of becoming a lawyer to his historical contribution in drafting the
constitution of India, all exemplified his visionary decisions.
These
kinds of decisions require the interaction and intersection of intuition and
logics to create such a magic!
Intuition – Logic
Interface
One can consider the intuition as the gut feeling of what
is right or wrong. It is generally shaped by the experiences one had in their past
and by their value system.
When we say logics, one can call it the ability to reason
any subject-matter, to analyse it and derive conclusions out of it. This is
generally shaped by one's knowledge on that subject-matter rather than their
past-experience.
While logics helps one to critically think and reason to
see the feasibility of options, it is the intuition which will ultimately guide
them to take the right path.
Consider Indian freedom struggle. Mahatma Gandhi had
various options for protesting British rule in 1920s. This period was also
marked by world war elsewhere, rise in revolutionary activities within, and
unrest of peasants & tribals in many parts of our country. Considering all
these logical options carefully, he chose satyagraha and believed it as the
right way to attain freedom even if it delays it. Though violence was perceived
as faster option, his intuition made him realize Ahimsa (non-violence) as being
sustainable in the long run, which proved to be correct. But intuition and
logics also play a role in evolving the path to the vision. This is also
demonstrated by one such instance where Gandhiji logically predicted that
Britishers will retreat with suppression against the satyagrahis. Thus, he did
not stop the Satyagrahis from resorting to violence for self-defence during
Quit India Movement. That is why, in his 11-point demand earlier, he wanted to
restore firearms license for Indians for self-defence. This is how he
demonstrated a successful logics-intuition interface for a visionary
decision-making.
There are also other instances where the logics and
intuition had successful collaborations. Amul was one of the most famous cases
considering the imprint it left on our country and beyond. The decision of Amul
of starting a cooperative movement and then spearheading the White revolution
in India, was a perfect union of vision and data-driven planning supported by
intuition. Later it became so impactful that even countries like Kenya tried to
replicate its model.
These instances not only prove that logics-intuition collaboration
help at making the right choices at long term, but also on how much impact it
leaves behind.
While thinking about this collaboration, one may wonder
what would happen if logics overtake intuition in a decision making. Will the
decision still be visionary?
Take the example of making a policy. If government is fully
data driven, it might come up with an ideal policy which might not have a
connect with the ground reality. During the 2004 Tsunami, the logical disaster
management practices failed while the local people’s intuition saved them from
the disaster. So, government learned from this to integrate local people’s
knowledge into the disaster management policy after that.
Another issue of too much leaning into logics is that it
can lead to sacrificing of values. Imagine what would happen if the government
privatizes the police duty in the name of bringing logistical efficiency. This
will not only compromise public safety but also will make justice inaccessible
to those with no purchasing power. This makes the decision making a ruinary
rather than visionary!
But it is not fair to say such ruinary occurs only if logics overtake intuition in decision making. It may also happen if the coin is flipped. Thus, we also need to understand the flip side of the coin i.e. case for intuition over logics.
If intuition
overtakes logics……
This scenario is not something new in the history of India.
During the 1970s and 80s, the government of India was pumping its money into sick
public sector units (PSUs), hoping it would get revived someday. They did not
stop this intuition-driven approach despite data showing poor performance of
those state-run PSUs. Such an action added with other external (global) factors
finally led India into severe BOP crisis by the end of 1980s. Thus, when logics
questions the intuition, it is wise to re-evaluate the course of action.
It
not only leads to such irrational decisions, but believing in pure intuition
also will lead to loss of confidence among the followers, thus losing the
support to achieve such a visionary goal. It is like a captain sailing the ship
to hunt the treasure without a map but asking the crew to believe in his
intuition about this unknown place. Over the time, the crew will lose
confidence as intuition won't guarantee the path to the treasure like the map
does. At least map helps to make the crew confident of their destination in
this unknown place. That is why we need to find a right balance between the data
and the experience to set the sail right!
Intuition – Logics
Balance
One has to be trained to see a situation without bias and emotions. This helps the mind to see the facts objectively in the options available. Here is where the modern science comes into play where data science and artificial intelligence gives a helping hand. It helps to interpret the statistics and data with minimal emotional hook, thus bringing objectivity.
After
that, besides the objectivity, the choice activity needs to be guided by one's
gut feelings. The gut feelings or the intuition is trained with ethical values
and past experiences. So, it will help to make ethically justifiable decisions at
the right time. A good decision that is ill-timed is equal to a worse decision.
Example of one such decision was LPG reforms-equivalent that broke the Soviet
Union in 1990s. But similar reforms were majorly successful in India because of
its political timings and the socio-economic backdrop which led to its
acceptance.
Another
way to attain such balance is to learn from the past. India came up with nuclear deterrence after it encountered various wars during 1960s and 70s
despite being a peace-loving country. This inspired it to make such a visionary
decision of becoming a nuclear power not to harm the enemy, but to protect its
citizens as a matter of self-defence.
Though vision can be called the imagination of the future, to make it a reality one needs to take a firm decision. This decision must be taken at the intersection of logics and intuition with their right proportion. Over-intuition may lead to irrationality while too much logic forgets the human factor. Thus, a balance between both needs to be fostered to truly bring the vision into limelight, making it shine. Let us knit our visionary fabric Viksit Bharat with the threads of logics and intuition!
Let
us foster the vision of democracy and discuss! Comment your thoughts below.

No comments:
Post a Comment